Skip to main content

Is Tesla Full Self-Driving worth it?

While many electric cars offer advanced driver assistance tech these days, most of those boil down to a few different technologies working together — like lane-keeping and adaptive cruise control. Generally, they work quite well. Together, they can essentially allow a car to drive itself on the highway under the right conditions. But companies are also working on the next generation of self-driving cars, and there’s been no company more public about this than Tesla, which offers its Full Self-Driving tech.

But while Tesla Full Self-Driving is available to customers, it’s far from free. At the time of this writing, Tesla offered Full Self-Driving through a one-time payment of a hefty $15,000, or as a $200-per-month subscription. Neither of those is cheap, and as such you might be wondering whether or not it’s worth the money.

Recommended Videos

The consensus? It’s probably not worth it for you — but some might still want to buy it anyway.

What is Tesla Full Self-Driving?

A red Tesla charging at a bank of Tesla Superchargers.
Tesla / Tesla

Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD) is an advanced driver-assistance system that uses a combination of hardware and software to enable a vehicle to navigate on its own in various traffic situations. The system makes use of an array of cameras, ultrasonic sensors, radar, and computers to interpret the surrounding environment, making real-time decisions to control the vehicle’s acceleration, braking, and steering.

There are a few things that set the tech apart from Tesla’s other autonomous driving modes though. The cheapest is Tesla Autopilot, which is basically adaptive cruise control combined with a lane-keeping assistant — features that many other cars have. Next up is Enhanced Autopilot, which includes features like Auto Lane Change, Autopark, and Summon, which allows the driver to summon the car to their location in a parking lot. These are much more advanced features.

Full Self-Driving, however, takes that a step further. FSD allows the car to identify stop signs and traffic lights, and will soon allow the car to steer on its own in city streets.

It’s important to note that drivers are still always required to be in control of a car, even when using these modes. Current regulations mean that the driver is responsible for the car’s behavior whether it’s in Autopilot, FSD, or any other mode.

Of course, that makes the name “Full Self-Driving” a little confusing. Tesla has been criticized for naming the tech Full Self-Driving, when in reality the tech cannot fully drive the car yet. It will likely be a while before the tech can handle all driving modes, and it will be a while before the law allows drivers to fully give control over to the car itself.

Is Tesla Full Self-Driving worth it?

A 2021 Tesla Model S.
Tesla

So is Tesla Full Self-Driving worth it? Well, it’s complicated. The fact is that Full Self-Driving is actually still in beta, which means that while Tesla is charging customers to use it, it’s still being developed and refined, and it will make mistakes. That means that it’s more experimental than something that you’ll be able to fully use to be more productive or to save you time.

In other words, most people should avoid spending the cash on Tesla Full Self-Driving right now. But it could still be useful for some drivers. If you’re really interested in testing out the latest and greatest autonomous driving tech, have some (or a lot) of cash to spare, and don’t mind the fact that the tech isn’t fully developed yet, then perhaps it’s worth considering checking out full self-driving, just for fun. But if you could stand to save some money, then you should consider simply continuing to drive your Tesla on your own.

Christian de Looper
Christian de Looper is a long-time freelance writer who has covered every facet of the consumer tech and electric vehicle…
Topics
You may have to wait longer for a more affordable Tesla Model Y
Tesla Model Y 2025.

It's been a while since Tesla gave a long-awaited makeover to its Model 3 EV, and followed it with the introduction of an updated Model Y in its home market. However, the company’s rumored plans for a more affordable SUV that will be assembled in the US have reportedly run into a delay. 

According to Reuters, Tesla was hoping to assemble nearly a quarter million units of its cheaper Model Y variant in 2026. The goalpost has now been shifted, and there is no clarity regarding a revised market launch plans for the vehicle, which is said to be in development under the codename E41. .

Read more
Tesla’s new Cybertruck trim goes low on price, high on range 
Tesla Cybertruck

Tesla has just introduced the most affordable variant of its Cybertruck in the US market. Carrying a sticker price worth $69,990, and dipping down to $62,490 with the federal tax credit applied, the new “Long Range” rear-wheel drive (RWD) model is quite an interesting package, in both good and odd ways. 

For starters, despite being the most affordable trim, it offers the highest per-charge mileage at 350 miles. The pricier All-Wheel Drive version delivers a range of 325 miles, while the top-of-the-line $99,990 Cyberbeast model can only muster 301 miles. 

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more